Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01948
Original file (PD 2014 01948.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD-2014-01948
BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE     BOARD DATE: 20140918
SEPARATION DATE: 20070921


 SUMMARY OF CASE : T he available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty S Sgt /E-5 ( 4A151 / Medica l Materiel Journeyman ) medically separated for chronic mid - back pain. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the requireme nts of her Air Force Specialty or physical fitness standards , so s he was issued a P4 temporary pr ofile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The back condition, characterized as “ c hronic back pain , ” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated the back pain as unfitting, rated 10%. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Please consider all conditions.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting back condition is addressed below; no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20070802
 VA - (~2 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Midback Pain, w / Loss o f Vertebral Height 5299-5235 10% Post Traumatic Degenerative Joint Disease of the Dorsal Spine w / Chronic Pain Syndrome 5242 10% 20071113
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 9 20071113
Rated: 10%
 Combined: 60%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 80430


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Chronic Back Pain Condition. Although the CI recovered from a thoracic spine vertebral compression fracture prior to service entry, she developed mid back pain in 2005 that (according to the available service records) was not a consequence of concurrent injury. Radiographic evaluation for persistent pain revealed old minimal vertebral compression fractures of T7 and T9 and minimal multilevel disc protrusions. The CI’s 1-year tour (beginning in 2006) to Korea was ended after 3 months due to exacerbation of the back condition from wearing individual protective equipment. Physical therapy, pain medications and injections could not sufficiently relieve the CI’s ongoing pain.

At an orthopedic evaluation on 30 April 2007 (5 months prior to separation) the CI reported that her pain stemmed from constantly lifting at work; it was worse with exercise, turning, and the pain interrupted her sleep. Examination documented that the CI did not appear uncomfortable; appearance of the spine was normal, but tenderness and painful motion were present. The examiner further noted “Full range of motion was present except for rotation and side bending.”

The commander’s statement dated 7 June 2007 (4 months prior to separation) reported that the CI was unable to perform non-administrative duties; and a physician directed that she miss two duty days during the prior 3 months due to her back condition. The narrative summary dated 11 June 2007 reported a normal gait. At the MEB examination for range-of-motion (ROM) dated 23 July 2007 (2 months prior to separation), paraspinal muscle spasms were reported, but comments of spinal contour and gait were omitted.

At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination dated 13 November 2007 (2 months after separation), the CI reported that pain began after falling onto her back while lifting [items] in a warehouse in August 2005. Back pain was constant, with flares caused by movement, bending or lifting. Medication could alleviate the pain. She reported no difficulty with walking, and did not use assistive devices. Examination showed no tenderness or spasms, and normal gait and spinal contour. ROM testing was repeated ten times without additional limitation; painful motion was absent although “tightness” during ROM was reported. Physician-prescribed bed rest during the previous year was denied. The goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

Thoracolumbar ROM
(Degrees)		 MEB ~ 2 Mos. Pre-Sep VA C&P ~ 2 Mos. Post-Sep
Flexion (90 Normal) 80 (77,78,80) 90
Combined (240) 215 240
Comment +Tenderness, painful motion , spasm
§4.71a Rating 10% 0% or 10% (VA 10%)

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB assigned a 10% rating under an analogous code 5235 (vertebral fracture or dislocation), while the VA also assigned a 10% rating under the code 5242 (degenerative arthritis of the spine). The Board agreed that the ROMs by the MEB examiner supported a 10% rating, but no higher. There was no evidence of muscle spasms or guarding severe enough to result in an abnormal gait or abnormal spinal contour, and therefore the next higher 20% rating was not justified. The Board also considered rating intervertebral disc disease under the alternative formula for incapacitating episodes, but could not find sufficient evidence which would meet a minimal rating under that formula. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the chronic mid-back pain condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the chronic mid-back pain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.

RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140502, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record





                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

SAF/MRB
Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXX:

         Reference your application submitted under the provisions of DoDI 6040.44 (Title 10 U.S.C. § 1554a), PDBR Case Number PD-2014-01948

         After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was appropriate. Accordingly, the Board recommended no re-characterization or modification of your separation.

         I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. I concur with that finding and their conclusion that re-characterization of your separation is not warranted. Accordingly, I accept their recommendation that your application be denied.

                                                               Sincerely,





                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Attachment:
Record of Proceedings

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00725

    Original file (PD 2012 00725.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the chronic back pain condition as unfitting, rated 10% with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Post-Sep (20071213)p.168 Flexion (90 Normal) 45 (65, 46, 43) 65 75 Ext (30) 20 (23, 21, 18) 25 20 R Lat Flex (30) 20 (20, 20, 17) 20 30 L Lat Flex (30) 30 (30, 31, 32) 25 30 R Rotation (30) 30 (23, 23, 36) 30 30 L Rotation (30) 30 (35, 42, 36) 30 30 Combined (240) 175 185 215 Comments Limited by pain No...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01094

    Original file (PD 2014 01094.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Loss of greater than 50% of vertebral height.§4.71a Rating10%10%The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.For the purposes of this review, the Category II “low back pain” and the history of “L2 burst fracture” were subsumed under the unfitting “posterior fusion” condition, as “one disabling thoracolumbar spine disability,” as also noted in the VARD, dated 9 June 2009. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01285

    Original file (PD 2012 01285.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The lower back pain condition was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. I have been rated by the VA for conditions that were not addressed by the Army: depression, bilateral knee chondromalacia, tinnitus, and migraine headaches.” ______________________________________________________________________________ SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI 6040.44 (4.a) is limited to those...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00130

    Original file (PD 2014 00130.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board agreed that the evidence in the record at both the MEB and C&P examinations supported the 10% rating IAW VASRD §4.59 (painful motion) for painful limited arm motion that did not meet the threshold compensable rating of 20% for “limited motion at shoulder level.” Board practice when rating ascode 5201 has considered 90 degrees of abduction or flexion “shoulder level.” There was no evidence in record of any other ratable impairment of the shoulder or incapacitating episodesallow for...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01679

    Original file (PD-2013-01679.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RATING COMPARISON : IPEB – Dated 20040129VA* -based on Service Treatment Records (STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Back Pain, Status Post Compression Fractures… 523510%Fracture of the Thoracic Spine5299-523510%STROther x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 4...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00273

    Original file (PD2012-00273.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pre-Separation) – All Effective Date 20040316 Condition Code Rating Exam Recalcitrant Thoracic Back Pain Secondary to T6 Compression Fx. The VASRD in effect at the time of separation (2004) uses the current General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine and does not have a 5291 disability code. The PEB used the old spine rules to rate the thoracic spine condition at 0% under 5291 criteria.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01892

    Original file (PD-2013-01892.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the worsening impairment with which her service-connected condition burdens her; but, must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01794

    Original file (PD-2014-01794.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The spine condition, characterized as “spine fractures” by the MEB was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The PEB adjudicated the T7, T11 vertebral compression fractures, forward flexion 50 degrees as unfitting with a disability rating of 20% coded 5235,vertebral fracture or dislocation. The VA rated the thoracic spine, residuals of compression fractures T7, T11 with a disability rating of 40%, coded 5237.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02501

    Original file (PD-2013-02501.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic subjective neck pain, due to C2 odontoid fracture…without neurologic abnormality or limitation of motion”as unfitting, rated 10%. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Subjective Neck Pain…without Neurologic Abnormality523510%Residuals, Odontoid Cervical Spine Fracture523520%20060118 20060208Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 720060118 20060208 Combined: 10%Combined: 40% *Derived...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00500

    Original file (PD-2014-00500.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation. The VARD cited the C&P exam, four months after separation, normal ROM,...